Guest Author

Each All Things PLC blog post author has been personally invited to contribute by the All Things PLC committee. All contributing experts have firsthand experience successfully implementing the PLC at Work™ process.

Don Adams, social studies teacher, Bloomington North High School, Indiana

Peers Helping Peers: An Update

In my previous post, I described a new program that I and others are working on to improve the performance of students who struggled last year as freshmen, and I said I would report back when we had useful data. We now have such data, and there are some positive early indications.

As a brief reminder, 20 students have been paired with a peer mentor, and each pair is on a team with two other pairs. (Seven additional spots were kept open so that we could add students after the year began. We now have 27 students paired with 27 mentors, and they are arranged into nine teams.) The teams meet a minimum of two times per week during special tutorial periods, three times when possible. In addition to basic academic tutoring, we are developing tools designed to help with life skills such as organization, habit formation, goal setting and tracking, and other foundational attributes.

In keeping with good PLC practice, our program is data driven. We have compared the performance of our students at the six-week mark of this year to their performance last year, and we have found some encouraging results. Of the 20 students originally enrolled in the program, 18 are doing measurably better. One is doing roughly the same, and one has actually regressed. Some highlights:

  • As a group, the 18 who have improved had an average GPA of 2.1 as freshmen; their average after six weeks this year is 2.8. Last year none of them had a GPA above 3.0; currently six do.
  • As a group, these 18 had 54 Ds or Fs in the second semester last year; now they have 18.
  • Five students have raised their GPAs by a full grade point or more, including two who have moved from 1.7 last year to 3.2 now.

We by no means view these results as definitive. The first few weeks of the year are obviously much different than the rest, and we fully expect things to get more challenging as the semester progresses. And even to the extent that the students have improved, many are still below our minimum performance goals.

But both by what can be measured and by what can be sensed—attitude, engagement, demeanor, and so on—we are encouraged. The students are quite open about the connectedness they feel to one another, and at their request, we are planning a cookout and outdoor movie night at the home of one of our members who has a large home in the country. As long as the spirit remains good, there is reason to believe we may be able to sustain these early gains over time.

I will provide additional updates as time goes on.

Comments

Carolyn Petek

I find this incredibly encouraging as our large inner-city high school just adopted a peer mentoring program within the last month. It is of course too soon to be able to anticipate the level of success we might obtain, but reading of such growth has left me hopeful!

Posted on

Christie Agbaosi

I currently teach in a school for grades 4-8. Two of my colleagues have implemented a tutoring club in which students tutor their peers in whichever subjects they many need help. To ensure that students who actually need help attend, students attend on a referral basis. That is, teachers refer the students who they feel would benefit from the extra help. So far, the program seems to have a good turnout of students needing help and tutors. I would be interested to see actual data describing how much of an impact this program is having on students' learning. The program is fairly new, so it is to soon to tell.

Posted on

Don Adams

Editha-

Sorry if I have misunderstood, but if by "standard of testing" you mean how their grades are calculated, nothing has changed. Well, of course they are taking (mostly) different courses than last year, but other than that we are making a straightforward comparison of their grades this year to their grades last year.

As for minimum performance, every student has personal goals. We do have a minimum goal of a C in every class for every student, but whether a student has a goal of A, B, or C in any given class depends on the class itself and any relevant history. For example, if a student has failed math classes previously, we might view a C as excellent progress. But that same student might have a goal of an A in a different class.

Hopefully that answers your questions, but by all means let me know if there is something more or different I can add.

Posted on

Elizabeth Phillips

This is an excellent concept. As you stated, the results are not yet definitive, but the students are excelling - and that is an exceptional update. Not only are the students receiving services from an academic aspect, but they are forming relationships with peers that can shed positive insights on them. I am fortunate that I developed around people who shared interests in being academically successful and who believed in me, as I feel these attitude are contagious. Not every student receives support and positive influences from their surroundings, so it is appealing to buddy them up with a mentor. How are your mentors monitored? Do they meet with faculty for training on how to be an effective helper, or are they just naturally inclined? I teach 5th & 6th so I think considerable guidance of the mentors would be needed. Any suggestions or comments would be greatly appreciated. Thank you for sharing!

Posted on

Rania Saba

Monitoring Student's learning on a timely basis and ensuring every student who experiences academic difficulties is receiving extra time and support for learning will absolutely lead to the best results. Helping with other foundational attributes is such a great initiative for high school students.
Please keep us posted on the student's progress.

Posted on

wayne abela

When reading this blog, I was immediately excited to try and implement this technique in my own classroom. I know that you said it was only the beginning of the year, but the numbers do not lie. I think the program is a complete success already, because the students have gained confidence from their peer mentors and that should really help them the rest of the year. Looking forward to viewing the results as you post.

Thanks,
Wayne
New York

Posted on

Editha Thurairajah

I would like to clarify a few questions that come to my mind.
1. Has the standard of testing changed?
2. What would be the minimum performance goal for the groups and how will it be measured?
Thank you.
Editha

Posted on

Josh Rogers

In our school, we are pushing towards using data to support our objectives. I think that you make an excellent point when you say that some things - attitude, demeanor, and engagement - are intuitive and are difficult to measure.

Posted on

Kimberly Cusack

I would like additional information on your program as well as updates. This is an exciting way to help students by pairing them up with academically successful peers! It only helps the students who are struggling to desire to do better! Are you using a particular method of tracking process (i.e. spreadsheet, etc) that you would be willing to share?
My email is reach4theSTARS123@gmail.com

Posted on

Don Adams

Thanks, Dawn. The program has been both more difficult and more rewarding than any of us would have guessed. We have learned a great deal about working with struggling students, and we have already made plans to expand and improve our efforts next year. I will certainly make additional posts with updates on our progress.

Posted on

Dawn Tacker

I love this concept! Great that the data is showing gains for most all of the students! Also love the relationship building that is being encouraged! I wish all if these kids great success!
Dawn Tacker
Texas

Posted on